On July 29, 2006, Dr. Anthony Fauci, former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the highest ranking NIH official to orchestrate the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, shocked the American public when he was subpoenaed and then basically refused to testify in the U.S. Senate, pleading the Fifth Amendment 111 times when asked questions about what he knew about the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 mutated virus and the mRNA COVID shots that, together, injured and killed millions in the U.S. and around the world. 1 2
Dr. Fauci refused to testify, even though President Biden had given him sweeping immunity for actions he committed between 2014 and 2024, which is the period of time when gain of function virus research was being conducted in biohazard labs in the US and China for the purpose of making bat coronaviruses more lethal and infective for humans. 3 A few days before Dr. Fauci pled the fifth 111 times, Senator Rand Paul released portions of the diary Dr. Fauci had written during the pandemic on his government computer. 4 Later, Senator Paul and Representative Ron Johnson also released text messages Dr. Fauci had written on his government cell phone. 5 6
Increased Risk of Cytokine Storm, Miscarriage in Pregnant Women Given mRNA COVID Shots Hidden from Public
Among the information revealed in thousands of cellphone text messages and diary entries is the fact that Dr. Fauci and senior health officials in the US Department of Health and Human Services privately expressed concerns about hyper-inflammatory responses causing cytokine storms in women given the mRNA COVID shot that could increase the risk for miscarriage in the first trimester of pregnancy. Dr. Fauci and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) officials admitted there was limited data on the safety of giving COVID shots to pregnant women. 7 But they did not inform the public for fear it would threaten public confidence in their adamant statements that the shot was safe for everyone. They were worried that pregnant women would refuse to be injected with the cell and gene disrupter mRNA biological if they knew what could happen to their unborn baby.
Instead, in what can accurately be described as an uncontrolled human experiment violating the informed consent ethic, women were not told what Dr. Fauci and senior public health officials knew. Instead, they were encouraged to get the COVID shot during any trimester of pregnancy. Today, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology still recommends that pregnant women get the COVID shot, 8 even though the CDC under the leadership of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, has withdrawn that maternal vaccination recommendation. 9
Long History of Vaccine Experimentation, Hiding of Vaccine Risks and Failures
What happened to pregnant women and their unborn babies during the COVID pandemic response, which was led by the United Nation’s World Health Organization and implemented by the US and other governments, is just the latest chapter in a long history of vaccine experimentation on pregnant women and children by doctors we have allowed to violate the informed consent ethic and put public health policy before the science, which requires adopting a utilitarian rationale that devalues individual human life in the name of the greater common good.
Fear and coercion is the tool used to do that. Today, mainstream media outlets are quoting medical experts warning that outbreaks of measles are being caused by Americans refusing to get vaccinated. 10 Conveniently, they leave out the fact that you can get vaccinated and still be infected with and transmit measles but only have mild symptoms or no symptoms at all. This means measles cases are occurring among vaccinated persons, but those cases are never reported to the government like cases of measles in unvaccinated persons, who more often do show symptoms, and are reported to the government. 11 12 13 The same is true for B. pertussis whooping cough outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations. 14 15
Officials at the World Health Organization – also known as the WHO - have long been calling the shots when it comes to global mass vaccination programs, buy rarely do they tell people the whole truth about infectious disease outbreaks or vaccine failures, preferring to put all the blame for infectious diseases on the unvaccinated and what WHO officials label as “misinformation” about vaccination. 16
US Withdraws from WHO As Global Multi-Billion Vaccine Business Grows
This year, on January 22, 2026, HHS Secretary Kennedy announced that the United States had completed its formal withdrawal from the WHO. 17 That announcement dealt a serious blow to the globalists, who have been working relentlessly since the early 1990s to develop a worldwide mass vaccination network that will require the U.S. and other governments to give up sovereignty when it comes to what kinds of genetically engineered biologicals people living in every country are required to put into their bodies. 18 19 20
Declaring independence from the authoritarian World Health Organization is a step in the right direction, but the vaccinologists determined to eradicate microbes from the earth play a long game. They will not give up the money and power that comes with the multi-billion dollar global vaccine enterprise that is worth $54 billion dollars today and is projected to grow to $111 billion dollars by 2035. 21
Mothers were, and still are, the primary caregivers for their children. They are the ones who are now being pressured by doctors to get injected with eight vaccines throughout every trimester of pregnancy – including diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, influenza, hepatitis B, RSV and COVID shot – at a vulnerable time when unborn babies are developing in the womb. 22 Mothers are the ones who take their infants and children into pediatrician’s offices where they are often strong armed under threat of being thrown out of the practice, 23 to give their children six dozen doses of 17 vaccines, many bundled into combination shots, starting on the day of birth through age 18. 24 25 26
While cracks are forming in the monolithic United Nations that harbors world government dreams, this commentary will shine a light on two WHO-funded vaccine experiments that went wrong in the 1990s. They are examples of how vaccinologists and the global elite feel perfectly entitled to ignore informed consent rights and exploit trusting mothers and vulnerable children in vaccine experiments.
NVIC in 1995 Questions Whether Neonatal Tetanus Vaccine Campaign in Underdeveloped Countries Was Designed for Population Control
In July 1995, I was the founding editor of The Vaccine Reaction, a print publication launched by the National Vaccine Information Center that, today, is a digital weekly journal newspaper. In one of our first editions, I wrote about a large Catholic human rights organization, Human Life International (HLI), that had raised questions about the possibility that the WHO was using millions of unsuspecting women in Mexico, the Philippines and Nicaragua as human guinea pigs in an experiment which injected them with an anti-fertility vaccine that they were told was nothing more than a new tetanus vaccine. 27 28
After becoming suspicious of protocols in what the WHO billed as a massive campaign to reduce the incidence of tetanus in newborn babies born in unsanitary conditions, pro-life groups in the Philippines had vials of the vaccine independently tested. They discovered the vaccine vials contained hCG - human chorionic gonadotrophin - a naturally occurring hormone essential for preparing a woman’s uterine lining for implantation of the fertilized egg and keeping the fetus viable and developing normally in the womb.
Anti-Fertility Vaccine Started Being Developed in 1970s, Pro-Life Advocates Get Tetanus Vaccine Vials Tested for hCG Contamination in 1990s
The World Health Organization, with the support of the World Bank, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Population Council, the U.S. National Institutes of Health, Great Britain, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, India and several universities in Europe and the US, had been working for two decades on an anti-fertility vaccine using hCG tied to a tetanus toxoid. Several decades of medical journal articles had detailed their progress starting in the 1970s. 29 30 31 The idea was to inject a woman with hCG using tetanus toxoid as a carrier so the woman’s immune system not only produces antibodies against tetanus but also produces antibodies against hCG. The hCG antibodies can then either block conception or cause a miscarriage because the body will not be able to hold the pregnancy.
After James Miller, a journalist with Human Life International wrote about it, 32 the WHO and Philippine health officials categorically denied the vaccine contained hCG.33 34 But when confronted with lab test evidence showing the vaccine vials contained hCG, as well as lab test evidence that there were high levels of hCG antibodies in 27 out of 30 women who had been vaccinated, WHO officials started making excuses. Journalist Miller explained:
“First they said there was no hCG in the vaccine. Then they said there was, but it was in tiny amounts. Then they said hCG is part of the vaccine manufacturing process. And now they are saying the tests used to detect hCG are flawed, and produce a lot of ‘false positives.’ But there is one fact that cannot be disputed. There is no known way for the vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been artificially introduced into their bodies.” 35
United Nations WHO and Public Health Officials Deny the Tetanus Vaccine Prevents Pregnancy or Causes Women to Abort Babies
Thirty-one years ago in The Vaccine Reaction, I described the WHO as “a multi-million dollar business staffed by physicians and scientists, including former CDC health officials.” When the news that unsuspecting women in developing countries were being targeted in a population control experiment without their informed consent, United Nations and public health officials immediately rallied to deny it all and brand critics as delusional. In a 1995 medical journal article entitled “Damage to immunization programs from misinformation on contraceptive vaccines,” the authors insisted the reports of hCG contaminated tetanus vaccines were only “rumours, apparently initiated by so-called pro-life groups” that are “completely untrue.” 36
Fast forward to 2014, when the same anti-fertility vaccine from the 1990s was again in the news, this time in Kenya, when the head of the Catholic Doctors Association in Kenya reported that the WHO and UNICEF had been giving hCG laced tetanus vaccine to women of child-bearing age since 2003 in that country. Church officials also alleged that the adulterated vaccine could render a woman permanently infertile. 37
In 2017 Researchers Confirm WHO Disseminated Tetanus Vaccines Targeting Women in Underdeveloped Countries DID Contain hCG
Then, in 2017, seven researchers from the U.S., Canada and Kenya published a peer reviewed article in the Open Access Library Journal confirming that it was true: World Health Organization-disseminated tetanus vaccines targeting women of childbearing age in Kenya as late as 2014 did, in fact, contain hCG. The vaccine vials were tested by nine independent biochemistry laboratories and revealed more than half the samples contained “hCG where none should be present.” 38
The study authors poignantly noted the “infamous Tuskegee syphilis experiment 39 that took place in the U.S from 1932 to 1972 ended in the very year that research on the WHO antifertility vaccines for family planning in LDC’s less developed countries was initiated.” In 2020, when the authors were accused of engaging in “anti-vaccine pseudo- science,” they wrote a brilliant rebuttal in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research defending the right of open-source publishers to reveal scientific evidence that pharmaceutical industry funded medical journals refuse to reveal. 40
The hCG laced anti-fertility vaccine makes me wonder what other kinds of ingredients are being put in vaccines to alter the biological integrity of the human race and change our future without our knowledge or consent.
The 1980s and 90s were bonanza decades for the expanding Public Health Empire conducting vaccine experiments on unsuspecting women and children before the World Wide Web created a new digital public square and allowed closer scrutiny and communication about what they were doing.
In 1996, NVIC Reports on High Potency Measles Vaccine Experiments Targeting Babies in Underdeveloped Countries
In June 1996, I wrote an article for The Vaccine Reaction journal about another vaccine experiment funded and conducted in the 1980’s and early 1990’s led by the World Health Organization, UNICEF and US federal health agencies. 41
In this experiment, babies as young as four months old living in Haiti, the Senegal, Guinea Bissau, Mexico, 42 Cameroon, Gambia, 43 Bangladesh, Togo, 44 New Guinea, Peru, 45 Rwanda, Philippines and other developing countries were targeted with an experimental high potency Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine designed to overwhelm the maternal antibodies and natural immunity they had gotten from their mothers who had recovered from measles as children.
The vaccinologists had already figured out in 1977 that mothers who had recovered from measles as children passively transferred robust and long-lasting antibodies to their babies to protect them in the first year of life. When those babies were given standard potency measles vaccine at 12 months old, they failed to seroconvert and acquire vaccine strain antibodies. 46 So the idea behind the high potency measles vaccine was to overwhelm and replace naturally acquired measles antibodies with vaccine induced antibodies. 47
Since 1980s, Global Vaccinologists Were Developing a Plan to Give High Potency Measles Vaccine to Babies by Six Months Old
Since the 1980s, the World Health Organization, US federal health agencies and vaccinologists at academic institutions like Johns Hopkins University had been involved in research to find a way to vaccinate babies by six months of age against measles in their quest to eradicate the measles virus. 48 49 50 51 They knew that measles cases were increasing in very young babies in the US and around the world when, in generations past, most children did not get measles until after one or two years old.
The “one measles shot will make you immune for life” theory, which had prevailed in medical circles since the live virus measles vaccine was licensed in 1963, 52 was shattered as it became obvious that antibodies induced by the vaccine do not provide the same kind of robust immunity provided after recovery from the natural disease. 53
In fact, today, mothers who were given an MMR shot usually at 15 months of age no longer have natural measles antibodies to pass to their newborns. 54 55 Babies are now vulnerable to measles from birth, and it is becoming clear that measles vaccine acquired immunity can wane and fail to prevent infection and transmission. 56 There are asymptomatic cases of measles in vaccinated children that are never identified and reported, so blaming today’s measles outbreaks solely on unvaccinated children is an unscientific bit of propaganda. 57 58 59
During the 1989-1991 measles epidemic in the U.S., the largest increase in measles cases was in infants under one year old.60
1989-1991 Measles Epidemic In US Reveals MMR Vaccine Failures
In a 1990 meeting of the federal National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC), where I served as a consumer member between 1988 and 1992, there was a discussion about the potential causes of the measles epidemic, including whether there was waning immunity or if several decades of mass measles vaccination campaigns using the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine had put pressure on the wild measles virus to evolve to evade the vaccine or create a more harmful strain.
In 1991, the National Vaccine Advisory Committee, headed by DA Henderson, who is credited with creating the global campaign to eradicate smallpox from the earth, issued a White Paper to Congress that was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association blaming the measles epidemic - not on the measles vaccine’s failure to provide long lasting immunity or the MMR mass vaccination campaign’s potential adverse effect on the epidemiology of the disease - but on the “failure to deliver vaccine to vulnerable preschool children on schedule.” 61 I was the only committee member who refused to sign that paper because I thought a more thorough scientific investigation should be conducted into why the measles vaccine was failing.
The fix the CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics came up with was to direct doctors to give all children a first does of MMR by age two, preferably at 15 months, and a second MMR shot vaccine before starting kindergarten or junior high school. 62 The push was on to strictly enforce state vaccine mandates as a condition for being allowed to attend daycare or to get a school education. 63
High Potency Measles Vaccine Experiment Brought to Los Angeles
It was against this backdrop, that the experimental high potency measles vaccine was brought to Los Angeles.
With the assistance of Kaiser Permanente, more than 1500 six-month old black and Hispanic babies in inner city Los Angeles were enrolled in a study in June 1990 using the high potency measles vaccine. 64 65 What the mothers bringing their babies to Kaiser Permanente clinics were not told was that their babies would be given the experimental high potency measles vaccine, a vaccine that had been flagged two years earlier by a researcher at one of the African sites for increasing mortality in babies within several years of vaccination. The mortality data that principal investigator Dr. Michel Garenne 66 provided was at first ignored, then dismissed as inaccurate and, finally, he was taken off the study when he warned that babies injected with the high potency measles vaccine were dying of immune suppression in concerning numbers, especially female babies. 67
Commenting on the study, the late Worth Cooley Prost, a former president of the Washington Office on Haiti told me in an interview I had with her at the time that “Haiti has been an offshore laboratory for drug research for decades.” She described how infants in Haiti were given the experimental measles vaccine at 10 to 500 times the usual dose levels 68 and some of the babies were HIV positive, but when the high potency measles vaccine study results were finally published, deaths occurring in the HIV positive babies were left out of the mortality figures.
Brave Researcher at African Study Site Publishes Data in 1991 Showing Increased Delayed Mortality in the Vaccinated
After facing opposition from vaccinologists advocating for use of higher potency measles vaccines, Dr. Garenne finally was able to publish his data about delayed mortality after high potency measles vaccination in The Lancet in October 1991. That month, enrollment in the LA study was halted. 69 70
Subsequently, the World Health Organization abandoned the global plan to contract with pharmaceutical companies for millions of doses of the high potency Edmonston Zagreb measles vaccine with the goal of giving it to every six-month old baby in the world. 71 72 73
In a June 1996 article in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins researchers reported that infants with the highest antibody responses to the high potency measles vaccine have the most profound immune suppression. 74
It makes me wonder why vaccinologists are so determined to create genetically engineered vaccines like the COVID shot that contain mRNA and nanoparticle delivery systems that act as adjuvants to manipulate and hyper-stimulate the immune response to produce more antibodies 75 76 when there is a potential for immune suppression and a fatal outcome in the weeks, months and years after vaccination.
Informed Consent Rights of Inner-City Los Angeles Parents Were Violated
Thirty years ago, I wrote in The Vaccine Reaction that:77
“The parents in inner-city LA were not told what it meant to subject their babies to a dose of measles vaccine many times stronger than normal. They weren’t told that measles vaccine can cause brain inflammation and death. Their human rights were violated – rights protected by the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki and US federal laws created to protect human subjects in medical experiments. It is just another example of vaccine researchers and public health officials willing to sacrifice the lives of individuals without their consent because they have decided the ends justify the means.”
In June 1996, CDC director David Satcher admitted in a Los Angeles Times article that a National Institutes of Health investigation of the 1990-91 Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine study found that informed consent regulations had been violated because the parents were not told their babies would be injected with an experimental vaccine that had never been licensed by the FDA for use in America. Both Kaiser and the CDC officials denied that any of the babies were harmed by the high potency measles vaccine, but they did admit that one child in Los Angeles who got the shot died from a bacterial infection that Kaiser and CDC officials claimed was unrelated to the vaccination. 78
Vaccine Experiments and Public Health Law: Devaluing Individual Lives in Pursuit of the Collective “Greater Good”
What these two scientific experiments on women and children demonstrate, just like the cavalier attitude of Dr. Fauci and senior health agency officials demonstrated when it came to hiding from the public the potential increased risk for pregnant women to lose their babies after receiving COVID shots, is that those in charge of operating the Public Health Empire believe individual human life is expendable in the name of what they have decided is the collective greater good.
They are so afraid to face the truth about what they have done and continue to do that they refuse to allow prospective case controlled clinical studies comparing all morbidity and mortality outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Claiming it is “unethical” to conduct a study where children are left unvaccinated, 79 they would rather protect the business of vaccination than find out if giving pregnant women and children so many vaccines is a major reason why many highly vaccinated children in America are so sick and disabled. 80 81 82
The scientists and medical doctors arguing among themselves about vaccination do not know what to do with the growing numbers of mothers who are refusing to give their children every dose of the dozens of doses of vaccines that the American Academy of Pediatrics tells parents children must get starting on the day they are born. 83 84 85 86 87
They still think they can force us to bow down and worship them - the false idols who have led us into the wilderness. And what they have forgotten is this: ‘The hand that rocks the cradle is the hand that rules the world.’ 88
It is the mothers, who carry babies inside themselves for nine months and give birth and who are connected to their children by a God-given intuition, a gut instinct, that helps them nurture and protect their children until they are old enough to survive on their own. It has always been the mothers who most often witness a vaccine reaction, and who are the first to recognize when their child can no longer say and do what they could say and do before the shot that changed that child’s life and their family forever.
And it is the mothers who have who have been bullied, shamed, censored and sanctioned when they listen to their inner voice and gather up courage and give themselves permission to stand up and say “No” to doctors exploiting their children.
NVIC Calls for An End to Vaccine Mandates
In 2025, NVIC officially called for an end to vaccine mandates because we know vaccine exemptions have always been the illusion that validates and props up the mandatory vaccination system. The granting of medical and religious vaccine exemptions are controlled by medical doctors and government officials, but there can be no exemptions to informed consent to medical risk taking.
Become a registered user of NVIC’s free online Advocacy Portal at NVICAdvocacy.org and work to end vaccine mandates in your state. Visit NVIC’s Cry for Vaccine Freedom Wall and read first person coercion testimonials about why it is so important to do that.
Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you could have done to change tomorrow.
It’s your health. Your family. Your choice.
And our mission continues: No forced vaccination. Not in America.
References:
[1] U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Testimony of Anthony Fauci. July 29. 2026.
[2] Associated Press. Fauci Repeatedly Invokes the Fifth Amendment in a Contentious Senate Committee Hearing. July 29, 2026.
[3] Mesa J. Why Was Dr. Fauci’s Pardon Backdated to 2014? Newsweek Jan. 21, 2025.
[4] Yilek C. Fauci diaries released by Sen. Rand Paul, touch on COVID origins and tense relationship with Trump. CBS News July 28, 2026.
[5] Office of Senator Ron Johnson. Senators Johnson, Paul Release Initial Texts from Dr. Fauci’s Government IPhone. Aug. 10, 2020.
[6] Office of Senator Ron Johnson. Senators Johnson, Paul Release Email Showing Top FDA Official Expressed Concern Over COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events. Aug. 16, 2026.
[7] Shockey D. Newly Released Fauci Texts Reveal Internal Early Discussions on COVID Vaccines and Pregnancy. Tampa Free Press Aug. 10, 2026.
[8] American College of Physicians and Surgeons. COVID-19 Vaccine and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide. August 2025.
[9] Hucko A, Kampmann B. Withdrawing DOVIC-19 Vaccine Guidance in Pregnancy. The Lancet 2025; 1(2).
[10] James J. Vaccine Exemption Surge Is Driving the Worst Measles Crisis in Decades, CDC Data Confirms. Medical Daily July 16, 2026.
[11] Fisher BL. The Science and Politics of Eradicating Measles. National Vaccine Information Center May 25, 2019.
[12] Mustafa M, Reznik AS, Urabe J. Measles seropositivity in previously vaccinated individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine 2025; 89.
[13] Equlls O, Kuliye T et al. A commentary on measles vaccine in the context of outbreaks: viral evolution, waning immunity and public trust. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 2025. 21(1).
[14] Fisher BL. Pertussis Microbe Outsmarts the Vaccine As Experts Argue About Why. National Vaccine Information Center Mar. 27, 2016.
[15] Wang S, Zhang S, Lieu J. Resurgence of pertussis: Epidemiology trends, contributing factors, challenges, and recommendations for vaccination and surveillance. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2025; 21(1).
[16] O’Brien K. Message by the Director of the Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals at the WHO – September 2025. World Health Organization Sept. 22, 2025.
[17] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. United States Completes WHO Withdrawal. Jan. 22, 2026.
[18] Fisher BL. WHO, Pharma, Gates & Government: Who’s Calling the Shots? National Vaccine Information Center Jan. 27, 2019.
[19] Fisher BL. Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism. National Vaccine Information Center Nov. 15, 2022.
[20] Fisher BL. Stop the World Health Organization Power Grab to Mandate Vaccines and Censor Free Speech. National Vaccine Information Center Apr. 11, 2024.
[21] Future Markets Insights, Inc. Vaccines Market (2025-2035). May 18, 2026.
[22] CDC. Guidelines for Vaccinating Pregnant Women. National Vaccine Information Center Aug. 22, 2025.
[23] Gold J. A pediatrician’s dilemma: Should a practice kick out unvaccinated kids? MedicalXpress Apr. 1, 2025.
[24] American Academy of Pediatrics. AAP Recommended Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule for Age 18 Years or Younger – United States 2026. AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases Feb. 5, 2026.
[25] CDC. Recommended Immunizations for Birth Through 6 Years Old, United States 2025. Also Recommended Immunizations foir Children 7018 Years Old, United States, 2025. July 2, 2025.
[26] CDC. Combination Vaccines. July 2, 2024.
[27] Tetanus vaccine may be laced with anti-fertility drug. International/developing countries. Vaccine Weekly May 29, 1995; 9-10.
[28] Fisher BL. Is It A Secret Birth Control Vaccine? The Vaccine Reaction July 1995.
[29] Talwar CP, Sharma NC, Dubey SK et al. Isoimmunization against human chorionic gonadotropin with conjugates of processed subunit of the hormone and tetanus toxoid. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1976; 73(1): 2178-222.
[30] Talwar GP. Pregnancy vaccine research. Netw Res Triangle Park NC. Winter 1985; 6(2): 7-8.
[31] Koshy LM. Immuno-contraception undergoing promising trials. Indian Med Trib 1994; 1(13):7
[32] Miller JA. Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth-Control Drugs? HLI Reports June/July 1995; 13(6).
[33] Union of Catholic Asian News. Court Stops Use of Anti-Tetanus Vaccine in Immunization Drive. Mar. 19, 1995.
[34] World Health Organization. Reports of Contaminated Tetanus Toxoid Vaccine Are False, Says WHO. World Health Organization (press release) July 19, 1996.
[35] Fisher BL. Is It A Secret Birth Control Vaccine? The Vaccine Reaction July 1995.
[36] Millstein J, Griffin PD, Lee JW. Damage to immunisation programmes from misinformation on contraceptive vaccines. Reproductive Health Matters 1995; 3(6): 24-28.
[37] Wasamu M. Is Kenya’s tetanus vaccine a secret sterilization campaign? World Nov. 11, 2014.
[38] Oller JW, Shaw CA, Tomljenovic L et al. HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World. Open Access Library Journal 2017; 4.
[39] Rogers K. Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Encyclopedia Brittanica Aug. 11, 2026.
[40] Oller JW, Shaw CA, Tomljenovic L et al. Addendum to “HCG Found in Tetanus Vaccine: Examination of Alleged “Ethical Concerns” and False Claims by Certain of our Critics. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research July 15, 2020.
[41] Fisher BL. Measles Vaccine Experiments on Minority Children Turn Deadly. The Vaccine Reaction June 1996.
[42] Markowitz LE, Sepulveda J, Diaz-Ortega JL et al. Immunization of Six-Month Old Infants with Different Doses of Edmonston-Zagreb and Schwartz Measles Vaccines. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 580-587l
[43] Whittle HC, Campbell H et al. Antibody persistence in Gambian children after high-dose Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine. The Lancet 1990; 336(8722): 1046-1048.
[44] Tidjani O, Grunitsky B, Guerin N et al. Serologic effects of Edmonston-Zagreb, Schwartz, and AIK-C measles vaccine strains given at ages 4-5 or 8-10 months. The Lancet 1989; 2(8676): 1357-1360.
[45] Berry S, Hernandez H, Kanashiro R et al. Comparison of high titer Edmonston-Zagreb, Biken-CAM and Schwartz measles vaccines in Peruvian infants. Ped Infect Dis J 1992; 11(10: 822-827.
[46] Albrecht P, Ennis FA, Salzman EJ, Krugman S. Persistence of maternal antibody in infants beyond 12 months: mechanism of measles vaccine failure. J Pediatr 1977 91(5): 715-718.
[47] Edwards K. Maternal antibodies and infant immune responses to vaccines. Vaccine 2015; 33(47): 6469-6472.
[48] Henderson RH, Keja J, Hayden G et al. Immunizing the children of the world: progress and prospects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1988; 66(3): 535-543
[49] World Health Organization (WHO). Research and Alternative Measles Vaccines in the 1990s. 1988.
[50] Markowitz LE, Sepulveda J, Diaz-Ortega JL et al. Immunization of Six-Month Old Infants with Different Doses of Edmonston-Zagreb and Schwartz Measles Vaccines. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 580-587l
[51] Hinman AK, Orenstein WA, Papania MJ. Evolution of measles elimination strategies in the United States. J Infect Dis 2004; 189 (Suppl 1): S17-S22.
[52] Immunize.org. Vaccine History Timeline: 1963. Jan. 23, 2026.
[53] Panpania M, Baughman AL et al. Increased susceptibility to measles in infants in the United States. Pediatrics 1999; 104(5).
[54] Waaijenorg S, Hehne SJM et al. Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella in Communities with Contrasting Vaccination Coverage. J Infect Dis 2013; 208(1): 10-16.
[55] Gans HA, Maldonado YA. Editorial: Loss of Passively Acquired Maternal Antibodies in Highly Vaccinated Populations: An Emerging Need to Define the Ontogeny of Infant Immune Responses. J Infect Dis 2013; 208.
[56] Bolotin S, Osman S, Hughes SL et al. In Elimination Settings, Measles Antibodies Wane After Vaccination but Not After Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Infect Dis 2022; 226(7): 1127-1139.
[57] Helfand RF, Kim DK, Gary HE at al. Nonclassic measles infections in an immune population exposed to measles during a college bus trip. J Med Virol 1998; 56(4).
[58] Vardos E, Kreis S. Isolation of measles virus from a naturally-immune asymptomatic re-infected individual. J Clin Virology 1999; 13(3): 173-179.
[59] Wright J, Crowcroft NS, Perry J et al. Do vaccinated cases transmit measles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Review of Vaccines 2026; 25(1).
[60] Atkinson WL, Hadler SC, Redd SB, Orenstein WA. Measles Surveillance – United States, 1991. JSTOR MMWR Report: Surveillance Summaries Nov. 20, 1992; 41(SS-6): 1-12.
[61] Henderson DA, Dunston FJ, Fedson DS et al. National Vaccine Advisory Committee. The measles epidemic. The problems, barriers and recommendations. The National Vaccine Advisory Committee. JAMA 1991; 266: 1547-1552.
[62] CDC. Measles, Mumps, and Rubella – Vaccine Use and Strategies for Elimination of Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome and Control of Mumps. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). May 22, 1998; 47(No. RR-8).
[63] Hinman AK, Orenstein WA, Papania MJ. Evolution of measles elimination strategies in the United States. J Infect Dis 2004; 189 (Suppl 1): S17-S22.
[64] Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Acute Communicable Disease Control. Edmonston-Zagreb Measles Vaccine Project. Special Studies Report 1995.
[65] Najera RF. The 1989 Los Angeles Edmonston-Zagreb Measles Vaccine Study and Its Legacy. History of Vaccines Feb. 24, 2025.
[66] Garenne M. The Niakhar High-Titer Measles Vaccine Trial, 1987-1990. Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2020.
[67] Aaby P, Samb B, Simondon F et al. Divergent mortality for male and female recipients of low-titer and high-titer measles vaccine in rural Senegal. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138(9): 746-755.
[68] Akaran JS, Halsey NA, Boulos R et al. Successful immunization of infants at 6 months of age with high dose Edmonston Zagreb measles vaccine. Ped Infect Dis J 1991; 10(4): 303-310.
[69] Garenne M, Leroy O, Beau JP, Sene I. Child mortality after high-titre measles vaccines: prospective study in Senegal. The Lancet 1991; 338(8772): 903-907.
[70] Cimons M. CDC Says It Erred in Measles Study. Los Angeles Times June 17, 1996.
[71] WHO/UNICEF. Expanded Programme on Immunization: Measles Control of the 1990s: Introduction of High Titre Measles Vaccines. 1990.
[72] Aaby P, Samb B, Simondon F et al. Sex-specific differences in mortality after high-titre measles immunization in rural Senegal. Bulletin World Health Organization 1994; 72(5): 761-770.
[73] Knudsen KM, Aaby P, Whittle H et al. Child mortality following standard, medium or high titre measles immunization in West Africa. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 15(3): 665-673.
[74] Hussey GK, Goddard EA, Hughes J et al. The Effect of Edmonston-Zagreb Measles Vaccines on Immune Response in Infants. J Infect Dis 1996; 173(6): 1320-1326.
[75] Suzuki Y, Myazaki T, Muto H et al. Design and lyophilization of lipid nanoparticles after mRNA vaccine and its robust immune response in mice and non-human primates. Mol Ther Nucelic Acids 2022; 30: 226-240.
[76] Lee Y, Jeong M, Park J et al. Immunogenicity of lipid nanoparticles and its impact on the efficacy of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics. Exp Mol Med 2023; 55 (2085-2096).
[77] Fisher BL. Measles Vaccine Experiments on Minority Children Turn Deadly. The Vaccine Reaction June 1996.
[78] Cimons M. CDC Says It Erred in Measles Study. Los Angeles Times June 17, 1996.
[79] Caplan A., Pasadyn FOL, Mamo N. Fool’s-gold science. EMBO Rep 2025; 26(16): 3979-3981.
[80] Enriquez R, Addington W, Davis F et al. The relationship between vaccine refusal and self report of atopy disease in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115 (4): 737-744
[81] Hooker BS, Miller NZ. Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders. SAGE Open Med May 27, 2020; 8.
[82] Mawson A, Jacob B. Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Study of Nine-Year-Old Children Enrolled in Medicaid. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Jan. 23, 23025.
[83] O’Leary ST, Open DJ, Gataldi JR et al. American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Report: Strategies for Improving Vaccine Communication and Uptake. Pediatrics Feb. 26, 2024; 153(3).
[84] CDC. Reasons Parents Gave for Not Having Their Child Vaccinated Against COVID-19, October-December 2023. Oct. 8, 2024.
[85] Kaushik A, Fomicheva J, Boonstra N et al. Pediatric Vaccine History in the United States – The Growing Problem and Strategies for Management Including Motivational Interviewing. Vaccines (Basel) 2025; 13(2): 115.
[86] Brownstein M. Poll: Trust in CDC has fallen dramatically in the last year. Harvard University TH Chan School of Public Health June 9, 2026.
[87] Henderson J. AAP Releases 2026 Child Vax Schedule, No Longer Endorses CDC’s Version. MedPage Today Jan. 26, 2026.
[88] Wallace William Ross. The Hand that Rocks the Cradle is the Hand That Rules the World. All Poetry.
Leave a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an *